Research / Weekly Pre-IPO Stock Secondary Market Update

Weekly Pre-IPO Stock Secondary Market Update | September 29, 2026

Higgsfield at $1B, the Inference Platform Repricing (Together AI, Baseten, Fireworks AI, Modal, Fal), and AMD Moves Toward Robots

Companies covered: Higgsfield, Together AI, Baseten, Fireworks AI, Modal, Fal, Island, World Labs

Higgsfield's climb to a $1 billion annualized revenue run rate roughly 18 months after launch ranks among the fastest ramps in private market history, and the August Series B at a $5.4 billion valuation now looks measured against that figure. The product sits on top of third-party models from ByteDance, OpenAI, and Anthropic, which invites the "AI wrapper" critique: if OpenAI launched a video platform tomorrow, would Higgsfield survive? We believe it can, because the complexity of the interface and the pace of product innovation are hard to replicate, and because revenue is shifting from individual creators toward business customers. B2B moats look structurally stronger than B2C ones. Forward deployed engineers and embedded workflows mean a rival must be better by multiples, not percentages, before a customer rips a vendor out, while consumers can cancel a subscription and switch in a day. Higgsfield is roughly split between the two today, so its upmarket move is the key to building durable lock-in. The longer-term vision of on-demand, personalized Hollywood-quality film, with a family member cast as the lead, shows how large the creative market could become.

Inference platforms, the companies that host and run open-source models such as those from ByteDance, Moonshot AI, DeepSeek, and Nvidia, are repricing at speed. Fireworks AI is reportedly heading toward $30 billion, Baseten toward $26 billion, Fal toward the high teens, and Modal near $15.75 billion. Against that backdrop, Together AI's July Series C at $8.3 billion, on more than $1.15 billion in annual bookings, stands out as relative value in the group, even though it owns its GPUs and runs a different business model. The strategic logic is a hedge. Roughly 7% of US debt, including hidden obligations, is reportedly tied to OpenAI and Anthropic, so the frontier labs must succeed, yet the scale of open-source disruption remains unknown. Inference platforms benefit either way: if the labs keep accelerating they need more compute and book more contracts, and if growth slows the compute is still consumed by open models. Our house view is that 90% of compute will be inference rather than training, and that 90% of inference will run on open models. Closed labs can still grow revenue 50% to 75% a year while ceding share, since a smaller slice of a much bigger pie is acceptable to investors. The cloud computing analogy applies: few businesses want to run servers themselves, and most will pay for an API. We see a 3x return over five years as the higher probability outcome from current prices, with several names capable of reaching $100 billion or more.

Island's $400 million raise in September at a $6.4 billion valuation shows that cybersecurity is increasingly an AI infrastructure story. The company has doubled ARR every year since its 2022 launch and consolidates security, identity, data protection, and application access in a single enterprise browser, which positions it to govern AI agents. Demand backdrop is strong: Palo Alto Networks, arguably the largest cybersecurity platform, is up 112% year to date, and agents online now reportedly outnumber humans. The media narrative around AI hacking points directly to better security as the answer, yet investors have been slow to connect those dots. Exit planning matters, because many cyber vendors are strong in a niche with a limited TAM (total addressable market) and are ultimately acquired, as Wiz was by Google for roughly $32 billion. The question for Island is whether Palo Alto buys it or builds the capability itself. We like the space on a risk-adjusted basis, but stock selection will drive returns.

AMD's roughly $8.2 billion all-stock acquisition of Fei-Fei Li's World Labs, which builds simulated 3D worlds used to train robots, signals that chipmakers intend to move closer to the model layer as physical AI comes into view. The deal may position AMD as the preferred chipmaker for robotics, tuning silicon to run world models efficiently. Decart, a similar business, reportedly drew a bidding war from SpaceX, Anthropic, Nvidia, and Google, so demand for the category is clear. Both companies chose a buyout over building independent frontier labs, suggesting world models are not yet seen as the next trillion dollar standalone opportunity. The broader trend is full-stack specialization, with chips, models, and software tuned for a specific outcome such as a robot, which can lower power use and shrink model size without sacrificing quality. We expect robots in homes within a couple of years, and note that investors may find AI infrastructure suppliers to robotics a more attractive entry point than the humanoid makers themselves.

Watch the discussion

All updatesBack to Research
* NOTE: AG Dillon ("AGD") is not affiliated with any pre-IPO company in its funds. Some pre-IPO companies require company approval for purchases (aka transfers). AGD has not been pre-approved by any pre-IPO company to purchase their stock. AGD purchases pre-IPO stocks in the secondary market and may gain exposure by directly purchasing the stock (on the company's capitalization table) and/or through a third party fund (aka special purpose vehicle, or SPV). When AGD purchases through a SPV the SPV general partner is responsible for obtaining the pre-IPO stock company approval, not AGD.

@ 2026 AG Dillon LLC and its affiliates ("AG Dillon & Co"). All rights reserved.

All information is provided for information purposes only. All information and data contained in this publication is obtained by the AG Dillon & Co, from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information and data is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. No member of the AG Dillon & Co nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors make any claim, prediction, warranty or representation whatsoever, expressly or impliedly, either as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability of any information or of results to be obtained from the use of the AG Dillon & Co Index Products or the fitness or suitability of the AG Dillon & Co Index Products for any particular purpose to which they might be put. Any representation of historical data accessible through AG Dillon & Co Index Products is provided for information purposes only and is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

No responsibility or liability can be accepted by any member of the AG Dillon & Co nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance involved in procuring, collecting, compiling, interpreting, analyzing, editing, transcribing, transmitting, communicating or delivering any such information or data or from use of this document or links to this document or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages whatsoever, even if any member of the AG Dillon & Co is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of, or inability to use, such information

No member of the AG Dillon & Co nor their respective directors, officers, employees, partners or licensors provide investment advice related to AG Dillon & Co Indices and nothing contained in this document or accessible through AG Dillon & Co Index Products, including statistical data and industry reports, should be taken as constituting financial or investment advice or a financial promotion.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes only. Index returns shown may not represent the results of the actual trading of investable assets. Certain returns shown may reflect back-tested performance. All performance presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested performance. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. However, back-tested data may reflect the application of the index methodology with the benefit of hindsight, and the historic calculations of an index may change from quarter to quarter based on revisions to the underlying economic data used in the calculation of the index.

This publication may contain forward-looking assessments. These are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Such forward-looking assessments are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially. No member of the AG Dillon & Co nor their licensors assume any duty to and do not undertake to update forward-looking assessments.

No part of this information may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the applicable member of the AG Dillon & Co. Use and distribution of the AG Dillon & Co data requires a license from AG Dillon & Co.